<p>Check <a href="
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/BudgetLRV.jpg">the image</a>, but more importantly, check the URL.</p>
<p>And didn't the Landing Module only contain two astronauts? Who's the <a href="
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/alsj.trio.jpg">stowaway</a>?</p>
<p>I give up.</p>
<p>Oh, well. At least <a href="
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/as11-40-5921.jpg">this photo</a> has the area under the <a href="
http://history.nasa.gov/ap08fj/pics/j-2_big.gif">main descent engine</a> nicely scoured by the expansion of the hypergolic reaction of the fuel mix.</p>
<p>Also, I think that the fact that the LM looks more like a <a href="
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5922.jpg">cross between a Hershey Kiss, a crumpled coat-hanger and a ball of used duct tape</a> is pretty good proof for the veracity of the landings. I mean, no WAY would Stanley Kubrick let a space ship THAT ugly into one of his films, in spite of what <a href="
http://www.galactic-guide.com/articles/8S12.html">some people claim</a>.</p>
Read more...Source:
Ghostly Talk - Paranormal Talk Show
